Ex-Starbucks Employee Sues, Says He Was Harassed For Being A Straight Man
Christopher Thevanesan’s lawsuit claims he was harassed and fired for being a straight, gender-conforming man.
A former Starbucks manager in Rochester, New York, is suing the coffee giant, claiming he was harassed and ultimately fired because he is a “heterosexual, gender typical man.”
Christopher Thevanesan, who had been with the company since 2014, alleges that LGBTQ+ employees at his store created a hostile work environment, while management ignored his complaints and eventually terminated him under false pretenses. His lawsuit, filed under New York State’s Human Rights Law, accuses Starbucks of discrimination, retaliation, and infliction of emotional distress.
According to the complaint, Thevanesan’s LGBTQ+ colleagues allegedly subjected him to “extreme and outrageous” mistreatment because of his sexual orientation (straight) and gender identity (male). He argues that he was treated differently than non-heterosexual employees and that Starbucks management “aided, abetted, tolerated, condoned, and facilitated” his harassment.
Related: Viral Video Shows ‘Karen In The Wild’ Freak Out On Lesbian Couple In Starbucks
While the lawsuit describes the alleged mistreatment as frequent and severe, it lacks specific examples of what that entailed. It does, however, assert that the harassment caused Thevanesan “serious, permanent physical harm and emotional distress.”
The lawsuit further states that Thevanesan was given conflicting explanations for his termination in 2022, suggesting that the reasons given were merely a pretext for discrimination.
Thevanesan’s case is being compared to that of Marlean Ames, an Ohio woman who sued her employer, alleging she was passed over for a promotion because she was straight. That case, which is now before the U.S. Supreme Court, could set a precedent for so-called “reverse discrimination” lawsuits.
While discrimination against anyone—regardless of sexual orientation—violates workplace protections, cases like these raise broader questions about what constitutes bias in environments that have historically been unwelcoming to LGBTQ+ individuals. The notion that LGBTQ+ employees are targeting straight colleagues remains unproven in Thevanesan’s case, and it’s unclear whether his lawsuit will hold up in court.
Related: Walmart Becomes Latest Company To Roll Back DEI Policies Amid Conservative Pressure
Starbucks has yet to issue a public response to Thevanesan’s allegations. The company has previously been a vocal supporter of LGBTQ+ rights, with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives central to its corporate identity. However, DEI programs have increasingly come under legal scrutiny, with some claiming they disadvantage majority groups.
Thevanesan’s attorney, Neil Flynn, told The Independent that his client has “moved on” professionally, but that the ordeal took a personal and professional toll.
Thevanesan is seeking compensatory, liquidated, punitive, and statutory damages—along with attorneys’ fees—from Starbucks and five former coworkers. The final amount will be determined in court unless, of course, the case is thrown out before it gets that far.
